Recently, I stumbled by chance over the fact that there isn’t just Codecov (that’s where the GitHub Codecov integration links me), but also Codecov – which fixes some annoying layout issues (yay), but on the other hand uses different code coverage coloring.
Anyway: I was wondering what the relation between the two is? Is this just an alternate view (where is this documented)? Or are the “app.” URLs a preview of an upcoming design? Are both going to stay around? Should I prefer one over the other?!
@fingolfin, you guessed right, we are in the middle of a design overhaul. We will eventually move towards only app. URLs, so I would stick with those ones.
@fingolfin, we will be redirecting old URLs to the new ones in order to not break legacy links. I would suggest using the new links going forward, but it should be backwards compatible.
Hi, thanks for the clarification! I stumbled on a similar issue (possibly related to the new design overhaul?).
When trying to view a file coverage report (line by line view), depending on if I’m from app or the “old” site, I’m presented with 2 differents URLs, and on only one I can see the coverage, for example:
Working URL:
Not working URL (the page loads fine, but the line-by-line report is not displayed):
Hi @bhathiya, I wanted to try your 2 URLs, and for some reason, the “non-app” URL redirects me to the “app” URL. Could it be related to the browser thinking I’m accessing the page from a mobile/tablet device? However, I’m really from a desktop Chromium.